Polk County’s financial audit for 2012 contained a number of findings relating to the financial statements of county government offices, including findings from previous years that have not been corrected.
Polk County’s financial audit for 2012 contained a
number of findings relating to the financial statements of county government
offices, including findings from previous years that have not been corrected.
The State Comptroller’s Office released the report, which also includes a
recurring audit finding that has shown up for three or more consecutive years –
that the county budget director did not maintain accounting records for the
Road Department.
The report recommends a central system of
accounting, budgeting, and purchasing for all departments should be adopted by
the county. The report says Polk County operates under the provisions of the
Fiscal Control Acts of 1957, which provide for a central system of accounting,
budgeting, and purchasing for all funds administered by the county executive
and highway superintendent, but exclude the school system. However, funds in
the road department are maintained by employees of that department.
“Sound business practices dictate that establishing
a central system for all departments would significantly improve internal
controls over the accounting, budgeting, and purchasing processes,” the report
says. The Comptroller’s office notes that an absence of a central system of
accounting has been a management decision by the County Commission and
recommends the adoption of the County Financial Management System on 1981 or a
private act to provide for a central system of accounting, budgeting, and
purchasing for all county departments.
Items not corrected from 2011 included a lack of
adequate records for state and federal grants in the County Executive’s Office
and an inadequate segregation of duties in the office of County Executive, Road
Department, County Clerk, Court Clerk, Clerk and Master, Register of Deeds,
Sheriff, and food service department. Expenditures exceeded appropriations for
both the school system and county government. Auditors reported multiple people
using the same cash drawer in the court clerk’s office and in the Sheriff’s
Department, some collections were not deposited within three days of receipt.
For 2012, auditors noted the failure of management to
correct record-keeping for state and federal money in 2011 as reason for it to
be cited again. Also noted in the County Executive’s Office was that invoices
were sometimes paid without proper documentation. The state recommended
purchasing procedures be properly managed to decrease the risk of paying for
something never received.
Expenditures exceeded appropriations in the road
department by $16,978 for 2012. The report says the deficiency exists because
management (then-superintendent Harold Hood) failed to present a final budget
amendment to the county commission for approval. Only the amendments approved
by the commission were included in the financial statements of the report.
Expenditures also exceeded appropriations in the
school system. Amounts overspent included $3730 in the Vocation Education
Department, $34,083 in the Adult Education Department, $52,813 in Support
Services and $52,988 in Capitol Outlay. The report notes this deficiency exists
because management failed to hold spending within the limits authorized by the
county commission.
In the Trustee and Register of Deeds offices auditors
found usernames and passwords being shared by employees. It was recommended
each employee use their own password; both offices discontinued the practice of
sharing passwords when it was brought to the attention of management.